Agromentis Research is committed to upholding the highest standards of scientific integrity and publication ethics. To ensure the quality, validity, and relevance of published research, all submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and transparent peer-review process.

We employ a double-blind peer review system, where both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous to each other throughout the process. This ensures impartial evaluation based solely on the academic merit of the work.

Once a manuscript is submitted, the Editorial Office performs a preliminary technical check. We verify that the manuscript adheres to the Journal's formatting guidelines, falls within the Aims & Scope, and passes initial plagiarism screening. Manuscripts that fail this stage are returned to authors without review

Manuscripts passing the initial check are assigned to a relevant Editor based on the subject area. The Editor conducts a quick scientific assessment to determine if the work is novel and robust enough to warrant full peer review

The Editor selects at least two independent, expert reviewers in the field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s methodology, results, interpretation, and contribution to the field. They provide detailed comments and a recommendation (Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject).

Based on the reviewers' reports, the Editor makes a final decision. If revisions are requested, the authors are given a deadline to submit a revised version along with a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments.

Revised manuscripts may be sent back to original reviewers for re-evaluation. Once the Editor is satisfied that all concerns have been addressed, the manuscript is formally accepted for publication.

Accepted manuscripts move to the production stage for copyediting, typesetting, and proofreading. Following author approval of the final proofs, the article is published open access on Agromentis Research.